stpeter said:

stpeter

is microblogging over XMPP a good idea? you decide: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/mic...

1 week, 1 day ago.

14 comments so far

  • kael

    This proto-XEP looks nice, specially regarding threading.

    1 week, 1 day ago by kael.

  • tobiasfar

    mircoblogging is nice for some things and implementations already make use of XMPP for it. However it seems to be more a hype and it's in constant development and features and such change, custom im bots can cover these changes easily, an open protocol can't. last but not least i don't see how he user experience will be better using this protocol instead of the current use of simple s

    1 week, 1 day ago by tobiasfar.

  • huni

    it would be very good, imho.

    1 week, 1 day ago by huni.

  • stpeter

    yes, perhaps a bot interface is the way to go -- most people seem comfortable with that, after all :)

    1 week, 1 day ago by stpeter.

  • nyconyco

    a bot with an ad-hoc command interface

    1 week, 1 day ago by nyconyco.

  • vardo

    I think microblogging over XMPP is the future as it now becomes obvious that using HTTP for this is not a good idea - look at Twitter, it is the symbol of technical problems. Of course there are probably other bottlenecks, but still.

    1 week, 1 day ago by vardo.

  • sciasbat

    I think the main advantage for users is that clients may have dedicated ui support, so that you don't get lost when the thread context changes, as it happens sometimes here

    1 week, 1 day ago by sciasbat.

  • stpeter

    yes that can be very confusing :)

    1 week, 1 day ago by stpeter.

  • dwd

    I think there's some mileage in a bot with certain known base functionality covered, so "microblogging-aware" clients might take advantage of it. Depends if we could get buy-in from Jaiku/Twitter/etc or not.

    1 week, 1 day ago by dwd.

  • stpeter

    true, I'll have to ping my various contacts about that...

    1 week, 1 day ago by stpeter.

  • biojab

    Of course Miccroblog on XMPP is a good idea !!!

    1 week, 1 day ago by biojab.

  • stpeter

    so we hope :)

    1 week, 1 day ago by stpeter.

  • dwd

    But your protoXEP looks good as a decentralized way of doing things, which makes a lot of sense. (finally!)

    1 week, 1 day ago by dwd.

  • ralphm

    Building IM bots is not easy. Parsing plain text for possible commands is not really great to do. Ad-hoc commands could solve that partially, and something like this for publishing would actually be pretty flexible, unlike what @tobiasfar seems to think. I did have a bunch of comments on the protoxep, though :-)

    1 week, 1 day ago by ralphm.

Sign in to add a comment